Copyright municipality can be a dangerous trap for the company. Disputes on common issues of copyright are often expensive, intensive and it is difficult to prove ownership. Several recent cases show that there are problems in co-authorship is created, it can - for example the recent case of breakage.
In the early 2000 BUSTED a band that had several hit singles was here in the UK. Recently, several members of the group wanted to be added as co-authors, couldCompensation payments. The band members were not able to prove their case. However, several days of evidence have been involved, and a significant amount of legal fees.
Another recent case also presented the problems of copyright in common and focus on the authorship of the song "A Whiter Shade of Pale." In this case, the organist, the organ solo of the song was composed considered a joint owner of copyright. This decision demonstrates the fine line between the contribution ofwork and co-author of a work.
What is the co-authorship?
If there is more than an author or creator of a work everyone has a copyright policy. Basically, it can be a problem for all companies that are copyright protected works, in which cooperation has been generated will.
create a rule of their work, the employer of their staff, but this is not done with the work of freelance contractors to true. done in this case, an agreement on the authorship of the contract. Employershould beware of paternity disputes in employment and freelance employees through appropriate conditions.
The issue of copyright is often made common in the publishing industry, where such cooperation is common. For example, a writer to write several chapters in a book and another to edit the same page and write different chapters. In this case, the authors are co-authors of the book. This situation is common in softwareThe industry, where a group of people contributing to a single program.
Copyright municipalities can have a significant impact on the value of work. This is one reason why many IP lawyers think negative. If someone is bound to a copyright owner in common, is likely to be entitled to royalty payments and have a say in the sale of copyright. This affects the value of copyright, as well as the potential buyer or lessor for the purchase or license any of the ownerswhich is much more expensive and time-consuming than in isolation with only one owner. Co-author also limits what the other owners can use their work to do. This means that if a party makes use of the material on the market without the consent of the other, would be an infringement of the copyrights of others.
Moral rights
Another problem associated with the common law copyright, moral rights. This right is independent of the copyright. A creator of a work has the right to be identifiedand as such is entitled to a derogatory treatment of work-object. As each revision, the moral rights of copyright in the work would have if they signed a contract employee or a contract, where waive his rights.
How to avoid disputes:
The best way to avoid litigation, and later on copyright and moral right to decide questions in advance. It 'best to conclude an agreement before the project to make the issue of ownership and rights to the addressesUse the final product.
An agreement should be more clearly address the nature and extent of each contribution share with copyright and moral rights. should any person employed by or working on the project is signed.
It 'also important to go on accurate records on how the work and keep what has contributed to it. These records will be extremely useful if you do not reveal a dress. After work is completed, it is also ideal for all participants to sign documentsto confirm that they agree with the account in the accounts.
No comments:
Post a Comment